 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
Sains Malaysiana 53(8)(2024): 1787-1810
http://doi.org/10.17576/jsm-2024-5308-06
Faktor yang Mempengaruhi Pengurusan Risiko Keselamatan Di Makmal: Suatu Kajian Kepustakaan Sistematik
(Factors Influencing
Safety Risk Management in the Laboratory: A Systematic Literature Review)
ZURAIDA KAMARUDDIN1,*, ZAIDI ISA2 & SAIFUL HAFIZAH JAMAAN@SHARMAN2 1Fakulti Sains dan Teknologi, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia,
43600 UKM Bangi, Selangor, Malaysia
2Jabatan Sains Matematik, Fakulti Sains dan Teknologi, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia,
43600 UKM Bangi, Selangor,
Malaysia
Diserahkan: 7
Mei 2024/Diterima: 26 Jun 2024
Abstrak
Pengurusan risiko keselamatan merupakan aspek kritikal dalam makmal kejuruteraan disebabkan oleh uji kaji yang kompleks dan kemunculan teknologi terkini yang meningkatkan risiko kemungkinan berlakunya kemalangan. Kajian kepustakaan sistematik ini melibatkan 23 artikel yang mematuhi garis panduan PRISMA dan mengkategorikan faktor yang mempengaruhi protokol keselamatan. Kajian ini memfokuskan kepada persoalan kajian iaitu apakah faktor utama yang mempengaruhi amalan pengurusan risiko keselamatan di makmal kejuruteraan dan bagaimanakah faktor ini mempengaruhi persekitaran keselamatan di makmal? Melalui penyelidikan ini, faktor penyumbang telah dikenal pasti dan dikelaskan ke dalam lima tema utama: 1) Protokol Pengurusan Risiko, 2) Faktor Organisasi, 3) Faktor Fizikal dan Persekitaran, 4) Faktor Luar dan Kontekstual dan 5) Hala Tuju Inovatif Baharu. Bidang ini mempengaruhi tindakan keselamatan dengan cara yang kompleks. Hasil kajian ini memaparkan protokol keselamatan yang berkesan, integriti organisasi, pematuhan peraturan dan strategi keselamatan yang inovatif. Pemahaman yang lebih mendalam ini meningkatkan langkah keselamatan, mengurangkan kemalangan, memacu budaya mengutamakan keselamatan dan menjamin pematuhan keselamatan. Kajian ini secara signifikan menyumbang kepada pengetahuan saintifik tentang pengurusan risiko keselamatan di makmal kejuruteraan, menangani keperluan kritikal untuk melindungi kesejahteraan manusia dan alam sekitar.
Kata kunci: Kepustakaan sistematik; keselamatan; makmal kejuruteraan; pengurusan risiko keselamatan; PRISMA
Abstract
Safety risk management is an imperative concern in engineering
laboratories, where complex experiments and emerging technologies increase
accident potential. This study provides a systematic analysis of factors
influencing safety risk management in such settings. This systematic literature
review involves 23 articles that adhere to PRISMA guidelines and categorize the
factors influencing safety protocols. The study revolves around question
research is what are the key
factors influencing safety risk management practices in engineering
laboratories, and how do these factors impact the overall safety environment?
Through this lens, the research identifies and classifies contributing factors
into five key domains: 1) Risk Management Protocol, 2) Organizational Factor,
3) Physical and Environmental Factor, 4) External Factors and Contextual, and
5) Innovative Future-Oriented Directions. These
domains intricately influence safety measures. Findings highlight effective
safety protocols, organizational cohesion, regulatory compliance, and
innovative safety strategies. This nuanced understanding enhances safety
measures, reduces accidents, fosters a safety-centric culture, and ensures
compliance. The study contributes significantly to scientific knowledge on
safety risk management in engineering laboratories, addressing the critical
need to protect human and environmental well-being.
Keywords: Engineering laboratories; PRISMA; safety; safety risk
management; systematic literature
RUJUKAN
Abdullah, K.H., Roslan, M.F., Riza, H. & Hadi, A. 2023. Fit
for work: A bibliometric review of laboratory ergonomics. International
Journal of Advanced Research in Education and Society 5(2): 16-28.
https://doi.org/10.55057/ijares.2023.5.2.2
Abouzahra, A., Sabraoui, A. & Afdel, K. 2020. Model composition in Model Driven
Engineering: A systematic literature review. Information and Software
Technology 125: 106316. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.infsof.2020.106316
Ali, S.I., Lalji, S.M., Haneef, J., Yousufi, M., Bashir,
K., Sohail, S. & Cheema, L.S. 2023a. HSE hazard
ranking of chemicals related to Petroleum Drilling Laboratory of University
using Fuzzy TOPSIS. Opsearch 60(3): 1386-1406.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12597-023-00666-9
Ali, S.I., Lalji, S.M., Haider, S.A., Haneef, J., Syed,
A. ul H., Husain, N., Yahya,
A., Rashid, Z. & Arfeen, Z.A. 2023b. Risk
prioritization in a core preparation experiment using fuzzy VIKOR integrated
with Shannon entropy method. Ain Shams Engineering Journal 2023: 102421.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asej.2023.102421
Alipour-Bashary, M., Ravanshadnia, M., Abbasianjahromi, H. & Asnaashari,
E. 2021. A hybrid fuzzy risk assessment framework for determining building
demolition Safety Index. KSCE Journal of Civil Engineering 25(4):
1144-1162. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12205-021-0812-4
Álvarez-Chávez, C.R., Marín, L.S.,
Perez-Gamez, K., Portell,
M., Velazquez, L. & Munoz-Osuna, F. 2019.
Assessing college students’ risk perceptions of hazards in chemistry
laboratories. Journal of Chemical Education 96(10): 2120-2131. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jchemed.8b00891
Ayu, I., Lestari, I.D., Lestari, F. & Tejamaya, M. 2020. Cost and benefit analysis of laboratory
health and safety management system. Indian Journal of Public Health
Research & Development 11(03): 2293-2297.
Bayer, S., Neumann, O., Raj, D., Savva, Y. & Scagliotti, C.M.D.A. 2023. TUM Data Innovation Lab Munich
Data Science Institute (MDSI) Technical University of Munich & PROCON IT
GmbH.
Chen, L. 2021. Research of the safety path of colleges
and universities laboratory basing on the analysis of grey correlation degree. Journal
of Intelligent and Fuzzy Systems 40(4): 7755-7762.
https://doi.org/10.3233/JIFS-189596
Chen, Z., Zhao, Y., Zhou, X., Hao,
S. & Li, J. 2023. Identifying the risk factors and their interactions of human–robot
collaboration implementation during engineering project construction: Evidence
from China. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management 30(7): 3073-3094. https://doi.org/10.1108/ECAM-05-2021-0461
de Genaro Chiroli, D.M., Baú, A.C., Deschamps, F., Sakakibara, E. & Christóforo,
L.C. 2019. Work safety management applied to a lab used by a junior company of
chemical engineering. Independent Journal of Management & Production 10(1): 281. https://doi.org/10.14807/ijmp.v10i1.787
Creswell, J.W. & Creswell, J.D. 2017. Research
Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches.
California: Sage Publications.
Corso, M., Cardoso, F.A.R., de Andrade, P.R., Rezende, L.C.S.H. & Sastre,
R.M. 2022. Management of occupational safety and health (OSH) in university
chemical laboratories: A case study at a University Federal Public service in
the interior of Paraná - Brazil. International Journal of Advanced
Engineering Research and Science 9(6): 145-151.
https://doi.org/10.22161/ijaers.96.14
Dedy Ruzwardy, Harahap, J. & Pradana Syahran, H. 2023. Analysis of fire protection system on the
multifunctional laboratory building of Ar-Raniry State Islamic University Banda Aceh Indonesia. Lingkar:
Journal of Environmental Engineering 4(1): 45-56. https://doi.org/10.22373/ljee.v4i1.2722
Ding, C. 2021. Risk assessment of physical and chemical
analysis laboratory based on the laboratory risk assessment model. Proceedings
- 2021 2nd International Conference on Urban Engineering and Management
Science. pp. 293-296. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICUEMS52408.2021.00070
Du, M., Han, T. & Shang, Y. 2022. Safety risk control
in construction engineering based on the interval analytic hierarchy process
and technique for order preference by similarity to ideal solution. Engineering
Reports 4(4): e12473. https://doi.org/10.1002/eng2.12473
Dunn, A.L., Decker, D.M., Cartaya-Marin,
C.P., Cooley, J., Finster, D.C., Hunter, K.P.,
Jacques, D.R.N., Kimble-Hill, A., Maclachlan, J.L.,
Redden, P., Sigmann, S.B. & Situma,
C. 2023. Reducing risk: Strategies to advance laboratory safety through
diversity, equity, inclusion, and respect. Journal of the American Chemical
Society 145(21): 11468-11471. https://doi.org/10.1021/jacs.3c03627
Engemann, K.J. & Abrahamsen, E.B. 2020. Advances in safety
risk management: Introduction. Safety Risk Management: Integrating Economic
and Safety Perspectives https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110638189-202
Eridani, D., Windasari, I.P., Septiana, R., Purba, J.K., Hasbi, F. & Reviana, D.A.E.
2020. Occupational health and safety management system in Engineering Faculty
of Diponegoro University using scrum model. ACM
International Conference Proceeding Series.
https://doi.org/10.1145/3429789.3429793
Galasso, A., Luo, H. & Zhu, B. 2023. Laboratory
safety and research productivity. Research Policy 52(8): 104827.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2023.104827
Gong, P., Guo, H., Huang, Y.
& Guo, S. 2020. Safety risk evaluations of deep
foundation construction schemes based on imbalanced data sets. Journal of
Civil Engineering and Management 26(4): 380-395.
https://doi.org/10.3846/jcem.2020.12321
Goulding, L. & McLeod, R. 2023. Spotlights:
Understanding human behavior following an accident. ACS Chemical Health
& Safety 30(1): 3-6. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.chas.2c00091
Guide, R. 2016. Resilience Resource Guide.
Gumba, H., Opiyo, M., Musyoki, J., Mutunga, M., Ngetsa, C., Mwarumba, S., Mosobo, M., Njuguna, S., Kai, O., Lambisia, A.W., Kimani, D., Cheruiyot,
R., Kiyuka, P., Lewa, C., Gicheru, E., Tendwa, M., Said
Mohammed, K., Osoti, V., Makale,
J., Tawa, B., Odundo, C., Cheruiyot, W., Nyamu, W., Gumbi, W., Mwacharo, J., Nyamako, L., Otieno, E., Amadi, D., Ouma, N., Karia, B., Thoya, J., Karani, A., Mugo, D., Gichuki, B.M., Riako, D., Mutua, S., Gitonga, J.N., Ominde, K., Wanjiku, P., Mutiso, A., Mwanzu, A., Sein, Y., Bartilol, B., Mwangi, S., Omuoyo, D.O., Morobe, J.M., de
Laurent, Z.R., Mitsanze, F., Mwakubia,
A., Rono, M., Nyaguara, A., Tsofa, B., Bejon, P., Agoti, C.N. & Ochola-Oyier,
L.I. 2022. Maintaining laboratory quality assurance and safety in a pandemic:
Experiences from the KEMRI-Wellcome Trust Research Programme laboratory’s COVID-19 response. Wellcome Open Research 6: 205.
https://doi.org/10.12688/wellcomeopenres.16704.2
Gupta, S., Kumar, A., Patel, R. & Kumar, V. 2021.
Genetically modified crop regulations: Scope and opportunity using the
CRISPR-Cas9 genome editing approach. Molecular Biology Reports 48(5):
4851-4863.
He, B., Bai, M., Shi, H., Li, X., Qi, Y. & Li, Y.
2021. Risk assessment of pipeline engineering geological disaster based on gis and woe-ga-bp models. Applied Sciences (Switzerland) 11(21):
9919. https://doi.org/10.3390/app11219919
Herepath, A., Kitchener, M. & Waring, J. 2015. A realist
analysis of hospital patient safety in Wales: Applied learning for alternative
contexts from a multisite case study. Health Services and Delivery Research 3(40): 1-242. https://doi.org/10.3310/hsdr03400
Hermanto, B., Syahrul, L. & Yulihasri, Y. 2023. The influence of organizational
culture, work environment, and competence on Safety Health Occupation (SHO)
laboratory employees with safety behavior as a mediation variable. Journal
of Social Research 2(8): 2773-2789. https://doi.org/10.55324/josr.v2i8.1335
Higgins, J.P.T., Altman, D.G., Gøtzsche,
P.C., Jüni, P., Moher, D., Oxman,
A.D., Savović, J., Schulz, K.F., Weeks, L. &
Sterne, J.A.C. 2011. The Cochrane collaboration’s tool for assessing risk of
bias in randomised trials. BMJ (Online) 343:
7829. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.d5928
Horner, C.A. & Wilmshurst, T.D. 2016. Stakeholder
engagement and the GRI: Implications for effective risk management. Corporate
Ownership and Control 13(3Cont1): 209-218.
https://doi.org/10.22495/cocv13i3c1p7
International Auditing and Assurance Standards Board
(IAASB). 2014. International Standard on Quality Control (ISQM) 1 Quality
Control for Firms that Perform Audits and Reviews of Financial Statements, or
Other Assurance or Related Services Engagement. 610 https://www.iaasb.org/publications/international-standard-quality-management-isqm-1-quality-management-firms-perform-audits-or-reviews
Kitchenham, B. & Charters, S.M. 2007. Guidelines for
performing Systematic Literature Reviews in Software Engineering. Version 2.3. EBSE
Technical Report EBSE-2007-01. Software Engineering Group, Keely University
& School of Computer Science, University of Durham.
Kort, N.P., Zagra, L., Barrena, E.G., Tandogan, R.N., Thaler, M., Berstock, J.R. & Karachalios, T. 2020. Resuming hip and knee arthroplasty
after COVID-19: Ethical implications for wellbeing, safety and the economy. HIP
International 30(5): 492-499. https://doi.org/10.1177/1120700020941232
Krechowicz, M. 2017. Risk management in complex construction
projects that apply renewable energy sources: A case study of the realization
phase of the energis educational and research
intelligent building. IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and
Engineering 245(6): 062007. https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899X/245/6/062007
Lemiale, V., Prakash, M. & Cruz, A.M. 2020. Data-driven
approaches to integrated disaster risk management: Special Issue of the 9th
Conference of the International Society for Integrated Disaster Risk
Management. International Journal of Disaster Risk Science 11(6):
693-695. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13753-020-00324-4
Lin, F., Wu, P. & Xu, Y. 2021. Investigation of
factors influencing the construction safety of high-speed railway stations
based on DEMATEL and ISM. Advances in Civil Engineering https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/9954018
Mohammadfam, I., Abdolahi, F. & Karimi, S. 2018. Assessment and risk management in the
laboratories of the School of Public Health, a Medical University Using the ACHiL technique. Journal of Occupational Hygiene
Engineering 5(2): 20-27. https://doi.org/10.21859/johe.5.2.20
Moher, D., Liberati, A., Tetzlaff, J. & Altman, D.G. 2009. Academia and clinic
annals of internal medicine preferred reporting items for systematic reviews
and meta-analyses. Annals of Internal Medicine 151(4): 264-269.
Moretti, L., Cantisani, G.
& Caro, S. 2017. Airport veer-off risk assessment: An Italian case study. ARPN
Journal of Engineering and Applied Sciences 12(3): 900-912.
Murcia, J.E., Martinez, S., Martins, V., Herrera, D., Buitrago, C., Velasquez, A., Ruiz, F. & Torres, M.
2023. Risk assessment and green chemistry applied to waste generated in
university laboratories. Heliyon 9(5): e15900.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e15900
Nixon, J., Nelson, E.A., Rutherford, C., Coleman, S.,
Muir, D., Keen, J., McCabe, C., Dealey, C., Briggs,
M., Brown, S., Collinson, M., Hulme, C.T., Meads,
D.M., McGinnis, E., Patterson, M., Czoski-Murray, C.,
Pinkney, L., Smith, I.L., Stevenson, R., Stubbs, N., Wilson, L. & Brown,
J.M. 2015. Pressure UlceR Programme of reSEarch (PURPOSE): Using mixed methods
(systematic reviews, prospective cohort, case study, consensus and
psychometrics) to identify patient and organisational risk, develop a risk assessment tool and patient-reported outcome. Programme Grants for Applied Research https://doi.org/10.3310/pgfar03060
Novák, D., Strauss, A., Novák, L., Lehký, D., Šomodíková, M., Lipowczan, M., Slowik, O., Doležel, J., Pukl, R. &
Sattler, F. 2023. Nonlinear probabilistic structural assessment: Findings from
Austrian and Czech bridges. EUROSTRUCT 2023: European Association on Quality
Control of Bridges and Structures: Digital Transformation in Sustainability 6(5): 1242-1251. https://doi.org/10.1002/cepa.2195
Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA).
2017. Process Safety Management for Petroleum Refineries: Lessons Learned from
the Petroleum Refinery Process Safety Management National Emphasis Program.
www.osha.gov. pp. 3-40.
Page, M.J., McKenzie, J.E., Bossuyt,
P.M., Boutron, I., Hoffmann, T.C., Mulrow, C.D., Shamseer, L., Tetzlaff, J.M., Akl, E.A., Brennan, S.E., Chou, R., Glanville, J., Grimshaw, J.M., Hróbjartsson, A., Lalu, M.M., Li, T., Loder,
E.W., Mayo-Wilson, E., McDonald, S., McGuinness, L.A., Stewart, L.A., Thomas,
J., Tricco, A.C., Welch, V.A., Whiting, P. &
Moher, D. 2021. The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic
reviews. Systematic Reviews 372: n71.
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13643-021-01626-4
Peng, T., Li, C. & Zhou, X. 2019. Application of
machine learning to laboratory safety management assessment. Safety Science 120: 263-267. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2019.07.007
Pertiwi, I.G.A.I.M., Aryawan,
I.G.M.O., Kristinayanti, W.S., Andayani,
K.W., Indrayanti, A.A.P. & Sudiarta,
K. 2021. Risk management of Material Laboratory, Department of Civil
Engineering, Bali State Polytechnic for preparation of Occupational Safety and
Health Program. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science 626(1): 012027. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/626/1/012027
Pollini, A., Callari, T.C., Tedeschi, A., Ruscio, D., Save,
L., Chiarugi, F. & Guerri, D. 2022. Leveraging
human factors in cybersecurity: An integrated methodological approach. Cognition,
Technology & Work 24(2): 371-390.
Rethlefsen, M.L., Kirtley, S., Waffenschmidt, S., Ayala, A.P., Moher, D., Page, M.J., Koffel, J.B. & PRISMA-S Group. 2021. PRISMA-S: An extension
to the PRISMA statement for reporting literature searches in systematic
reviews. Systematic Reviews 10(1): 39.
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13643-020-01542-z
Sajorda, M.B.B. & Martin, M.L.A. 2023. Composite laboratory
structural equipment safety factors at the Philippine State College of
Aeronautics. Iconic Research and Engineering Journal 6(12): 495-504.
Sarac, A., Absi, N. & Dauzere-Pérès, S. 2010. A literature review on the impact
of RFID technologies on supply chain management. International Journal of
Production Economics 128(1): 77-95.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2010.07.039
Shah, A.S., Fayaz, M., Shah, A.
& Shah, S. 2016. Risk management policy of telecommunication and
engineering laboratory. International Journal of Hybrid Information Technology 9(4): 281-290. https://doi.org/10.14257/ijhit.2016.9.4.24
Shamseer, L., Moher, D., Clarke, M., Ghersi,
D., Liberati, A., Petticrew,
M., Shekelle, P., Stewart, L.A. & PRISMA-P Group.
2015. Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis
protocols (prisma-p) 2015: Elaboration and
explanation. BMJ (Online) 350: g7647. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.g7647
Shao, Q., Dong, M., Shen, Z., Yang, R. & Wang, H.
2021. Integrating ergonomics into safety management: A conceptual risk
assessment model for tower controllers at multiple altitudes. IEEE Access 9: 93364-93383. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2021.3091528
Shariff, A.M. & Norazahar, N.
2012. At-risk behaviour analysis and improvement
study in an academic laboratory. Safety Science 50(1): 29-38.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2011.06.008
Shen, Z., Zhang, M., Liu, Y. & Jiang, C. 2021.
Research on the influence mechanism of safety risk factors on traffic
organization of high-speed railway construction. IOP Conference Series:
Earth and Environmental Science 647: 012174.
https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/647/1/012174
Snyder, H. 2019. Literature review as a research
methodology: An overview and guidelines. Journal of Business Research 104: 333-339. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.07.039
Stuart, R., Sweet, E., Labosky,
M., Box, M. & Mulcahy, M.B. 2022. Introduction to
a virtual special issue: Safe lab design. ACS Chemical Health and Safety 29(5): 387-388. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.chas.2c00067
The Safety Engineering and Risk Analysis Division
(SERAD). 2001. Description of Sessions Organized by the Safety Engineering and
Risk Analysis Division (SERAD). International Mechanical Engineering
Congress & Exposition 6: 91-95.
https://doi.org/10.1115/imece2001/ts-23418
Tobia, M., Tartaglia, R., Giampaoli, A., Perruzza, R. &
Farina, G. 2014. Fire risk analysis with a performance-based fire safety
engineering approach and FDS models for underground facilities in Gran Sasso National Laboratories. WIT Transactions on
Information and Communication Technologies 47: 193-204.
https://doi.org/10.2495/RISK140171
Tziakou, E., Fragkaki, A.G. & Platis, A. 2023. Identifying risk management challenges in
laboratories. Accreditation and Quality Assurance 28(4): 167-179.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00769-023-01540-3
Urata, S., Kuroda, K. & Tonegawa,
Y. 2023. Sustainable Development Disciplines for Society: Breaking
Down the 5Ps - People, Planet, Prosperity, Peace, and Partnerships. Springer.
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-5145-9
Wang, L., Wu, W.M., Bolan, N.S., Tsang, D.C., Li, Y.,
Qin, M. & Hou, D. 2021. Environmental fate,
toxicity and risk management strategies of nanoplastics in the environment: Current status and future perspectives. Journal of
Hazardous Materials 401: 123415. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2020.123415
Xu, C., Guo, L., Wang, K.,
Yang, T., Feng, Y., Wang, H., Li, D. & Fu, G. 2023a. Current challenges of
university laboratory: Characteristics of human factors and safety management
system deficiencies based on accident statistics. Journal of Safety Research 86: 318-335. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JSR.2023.07.010
Xu, S., Chen, M., Zhou, Y. & Wang, Y. 2023b.
Identification and analysis of influencing factors on construction quality
management for rural drinking water safety projects. Water Supply 23(7):
2814-2832. https://doi.org/10.2166/ws.2023.162
Yang, J., Xuan, S., Hu, Y., Liu, X., Bian,
M., Chen, L., Lv, S., Wang, P., Li, R., Zhang, J.,
Shu, C.M. & Dou, Z. 2022. The framework of safety management on university
laboratory. Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries 80:
104871. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jlp.2022.104871
Young, S., Bethel, A., Keenan, C., Ghezzi-Kopel,
K., Moreton, E., Pickup, D., Premji, Z.A., Rogers, M.
& Viinholt, B.C.A. 2021. PROTOCOL: Searching and
reporting in Campbell Collaboration systematic reviews: An assessment of
current methods. Campbell Systematic Reviews 17(4): e1208.
https://doi.org/10.1002/cl2.1208
Zhang, P. & Luo, F. 2017. Influencing factors of
runway incursion risk and their interaction mechanism based on DEMATEL-ISM. Tehnicki Vjesnik -
Technical Gazette 24(6): 1853-1861.
https://doi.org/10.17559/tv-20170928105858
Zhang, Y., Mao, P., Li, H., Xu, Y., You, D., Liu, H.,
Huang, W. & Yuan, J. 2020. Assessing the safety risks of civil engineering
laboratories based on lab criticity index: A case
study in Jiangsu Province. International Journal of Environmental Research
and Public Health 17(17): 6244. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17176244
Zhao, J., Cui, H., Wang, G., Zhang, J. & Yang, R.
2023. Risk assessment of safety level in university laboratories using
questionnaire and Bayesian network. Journal of Loss Prevention in the
Process Industries 83: 105054. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jlp.2023.105054
*Pengarang untuk surat-menyurat; email: p115610@siswa.ukm.edu.my
|
|||
|
